Tuesday, October 30, 2007

30 Days of Night 3.5/5 reviewed by Mike

I know I'm the Crew's resident comic book nerd, but, alas, I have failed you all. I have not actually read the graphic novel "30 Days of Night," which this movie is based on. It makes it even more sad knowing that I'm such a fan of artist Ben Templesmith's other work. But enough of my failings--this movie is not a failure at all, not by a longshot.

Steve Niles, writer of the "30 Days" comic and it's spinoffs, co-wrote the script for this movie himself, which should say something about clarity of vision, but since I haven't read the comic, who am I to judge? In any case, the story is about the small town of Barrow, Alaska, the northernmost town in the United States. Due to that pesky tilt in the Earth's axis, once a year, this town is plunged into perpetual nighttime for 30 days. Of course, no sun means Vampires can endure 24-7, which they do. How will Josh Hartnett and his ragtag band of survivors face the horrors of a Vampire gang when no sunlight is in store for a month?

As cheesy as you make the premise sound, this movie is as far from cheesy as it gets. In fact, this is one of the most chilling films I've seen in recent memory. The Vampires are quick, brutal, and utterly terrifying. This ain't your parent's Bela Lugosi, these are pale faced, blood stained, serrated teeth sporting monsters from the pit of hell who communicate in the most gutteral and bone-chilling screams you've ever heard in your life. While the first few deaths are the normal "horror movie" kind (whos there--whats that behind the camera--don't turn around--oh! ah...), the movie quickly turns into something more akin to a war film as the monsters take the town with ruthless force. There's a long tracking overhead shot at one point, just going through the town as dozens of civillians run terrified form dozens of vampires, sometimes crossing paths. The music fades to silence, and you feel your heart drop into your gut, partly from sheer terror, but mostly from the profound sense of loss. The only other horror movie to make me feel this way was 28 Days Later.

The rest of the film focuses on a small group of survivors that grows smaller by the day, and their efforts to last the month until the sun comes out. Along the way are more than a few encounters that may or may not give you nightmares. I'll never forget the swing-set scene. Never ever. What I like is how there's never a need to explain anything--there's only one line of dialog that hints at the history of the Vampires, and thats how it should be. These monsters come out of the cold Alaskan fog and no one where where or why, and that only strengthens the terror.

Lets talk craft: the landscapes are amazing. I was sold from the first frame. Everything fades into white snow-laced fog, and the town seems to exist independent of reality, totally isolated from the rest of existence by the harsh Alaskan landscape. I don't think you ever see the edge of any building, everything's always being swallowed up by fog, which creates the perfect mood for this story. Sound effects were a little over the top at times (large bass hits when something creeps in front of the camera get annoying after a while, but do make you jump) but the screams of the Vampires, the make up effects... all are top notch and creepy as hell. The music is great also, and is always exactly what it should be.

There's a few things that bugged me, though. A lack of characterization is one. Although you care about the characters a lot more than, say, a "Saw" movie, some extra time spent characterizing these people would have really helped. What also doesn't help was the few moments of ridiculousness. The "oh, let's talk about our relationship in the midst of death... seeing my friends get mauled makes me feel romantic" moments. Those moments are few and far between, but you'll roll your eyes once or twice. Also, I felt like Hartnett really phoned this in. His performance is pretty... stock. He looks and sounds like an actor workshopping his lines, he never seems to embody a character. Although I've certainly seen worse acting out there, it did cut into the believability the rest of the film worked so hard to create.

The real reason this movie isn't a 4: It's lacking in thematic material. It's a great horror story, but it's not really ABOUT anything. In a very loose way it's about family (kindof) but mostly, it's just a good Vampire story, devoid of any sort of artistic statement.

If you're a horror fan, this is a must-see. If you're in that Halloween mood, this is a great film to go get good and scared by. It's great to finally see Vampires treated well. Most Vampire movies are strongly forgettable, but this one delivers the scares in spades. Just don't set your expectations too high.

See This Movie If:
-You like films like: 28 Days Later, The Descent, etc.
-You don't like slahser flicks--although this is very VERY gory, it's not torture-porn
-You like scary movies, vampire movies, etc. in general. This might become a favorite of the genre, just as the comic has.
-Your name is Corey

Don't See This Movie If:
-You're under 17. Most violence and gore EVER. I'm not kidding.
-You scare real easily
-You really don't like the genre. Although I think might change your mind about it.

Monday, October 15, 2007

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford 5/5 review by Chris (Joe)

I don’t really keep up with “Hollywood chatter” as well as a self-proclaimed film critic should, so I don’t know if this movie is generating Oscar buzz, but I DO know that it should be…BOOYA! (Damn I’m cool).


The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford



-In theaters now-


IMDB synopsis:
Robert Ford, who's idolized Jesse James since childhood, tries hard to join the reforming gang of the Missouri outlaw, but gradually becomes resentful of the bandit leader.


Chris’s review:
I’m sure at some point in the history of this website I have proclaimed my love of Brad Pitt. If not, let me do it here: BRAD PITT IS EXCELLENT! And now, hopefully, he will get the credit he rightly deserves. I have been screaming from the mountain tops since Se7en and 12 Monkeys that Brad is far more than a pretty face and a sculpted body. The man has serious ability and it is on display in this film.

However, as good as Brad is, an up and comer may outshine him. Casey Affleck, yes the younger, more talented brother of Ben, and the very funny, oft-overlooked part of the Oceans team in the Oceans films, is the REAL star of this beautiful film. Casey plays Robert Ford, the young, ambitious, unstable, malicious, plotting, menacing killer of Jesse James. The character has a depth to him that is rarely seen in film and Casey brings it out in an amazing performance.

On top of the great performances this movie also displays amazing craft, which is surprising considering this is writer/director Andrew Dominik’s first major release. From the start you will be taken in by the wonderful visuals. There is a lens that is used throughout the film for establishing, moody kind of shots and its effect is wonderful. The script itself is also very well written, being an adaptation from the successful Ron Hansen novel. If you like Historical Fiction, this is your kind of script.

Now this IS a very long film, clocking in at about 2 hours and 40 minutes, AND it DOES feel long, BUT the length never upset me. Every aspect of the movie is so good that you really don’t it to end. You would allow it to keep going just so you don’t have to leave that world.

In the hope of shortening my reviews I’ll cut this off here, but know that this is a GREAT movie that is the very reason film is still a GREAT medium. Go see it, if for no other reason, than 2 brilliant performers at the height of their games.


Chris’s recommendations:
See this movie if…
-You were a fan of Unforgiven or The Proposition. This is a “western” more in that vein than the vein of shoot ‘em up westerns.
-You enjoy going to a movie and allowing yourself to be swept up in to the world it creates. Classic escapism through entertainment and there isn’t a damned thing wrong with that.
-A good script free of cookie cutter “good” and “bad” characters is something that interests you. You will find yourself feeling for everyone in this movie at one point or another as well as hating them at one point or another. That is a very good thing, trust me.

Don’t see this movie if…
-Going to a 2 hour 40 minute movie greatly cuts in to your time to race your jeep against your frat brother Chaz before you head over to the local bar to do keg stands.
-You expect a western to give you 8 six shooter fights, 3 horse chases, 1 indian scalping, 76 shots of whiskey, 4 guys getting shot for having aces up their sleeves, and the General Lee. If those are your stipulations for a western, you WILL be sorely disappointed. This is more a period piece than your standard western, but even then it doesn’t fit perfectly in to the genre.
-I can’t think of any other clever ones. Just go see it. I think it is good.

Monday, October 08, 2007

3:10 to Yuma 4/5 reviewed by Mike

I know we're a little behind the ball on reviewing this one, but it's still in a lot of theaters, if you hurry, you can still catch this really cool remake of a really cool classic western. This one had me fully sold right from the first scene.

If you're unfamiliar with the original "3:10," the story is about a down-on-his-luck rancher named Dan Evans (Christian Bale) who gets intertwined with one of the baddest dudes around, Ben Wade (Russel Crowe). Dan isn't just down on his luck, he's about to loose everything, his ranch, his family, what shred of identity he still has, when he finds himself unwittingly involved in Ben Wade's capture. Dan subsequently volunteers to help escort Wade to the train that'll take him to prison. What follows is a great character drama, where we really get into these characters heads, and watch them try and get into each other's heads to gain the upper hand. There's some great themes, too, about redemption and sacrifice, having goals and dreams in a broken world, deciding what kind of person you're going to become... none of these are heavy handed or preachy at ALL, rather, subtle and tasteful.

Even if the characters start out as typical western stereotypes, they're deeply explored and fully realized. The dialog is great, too, and never forced or contrived. There were plenty of times where you thought you were going to be able to predict the next line (people around me in the theater tried) but it almost never went there. That said, the story structure was a bit weak. The second act isn't very cohesive, it basically throws a bunch of random encounters at our protagonists (including great cameos from Luke Wilson, and my favorite Alan Tudyk) that they quickly get out of and move on to the next. It's exciting, yes, but clearly devices to extend the movie, as they don't always tie into the main story or the themes as well as they could. I'll say this, though, a journey like this in the real American West would probably be a lot of random encounters like that, so while I'll give it points for realism (minus the Apache encounter--no way could it be THAT easy), it wasn't the best structured movie.

If I had to grade this movie just on story, it'd probably be a 3 or 3.5, but the craft elements really pushed this movie up to a 4. The acting, in every single role, is fantastic. Bale is again brilliant, Crowe, despite how I think of him as a person, is a great actor and proves it yet again. Tudyk does a great job in his role, as do all the side characters, even the kids. Only when Luke Wilson showed up did I realize I was watching actors, and thats not because his acting was bad (quite the opposite) it's because his baby-face is just so cutesy...

Other craft elements were great--music was just right, and the costumes and make-up were incredible. I usually don't notice such things, but they were just SO well done here--meaning that no one ever looked pretty (minus Wilson). When someone got hit, you saw their face bruise up and stay that way for the rest of the film. Nice work. The directing is also great--camera work was beautiful, interesting, and exciting. The locations were so beautiful--looking at the environment really pulled me into this film and made it very real, yet very romanticized at the same time.

While there's nothing here you haven't seen in other westerns, particularly older 50s and 60s ones, it's done SO well that it's worth checking out. If you're a western fan, you'll probably want this on your shelf. If you're not a western fan, there's still probably enough here to keep you interested, even if it doesn't blow your mind. Go catch this one before it's gone from theaters!

See this movie if:
-You're a fan of the Western Genre, in particular the older, "classic" westerns (think: Big Country, the original 3:10, the Shootist, Liberty Valance, NOT the Eastwood stuff)
-If you like the ideas in some of those older westerns, but don't like the cheese factor. This movie has very high production value and no cheese, but retains the spirit and feel of a 50s-60s western.
-You like character dramas where character is more important than action (not to say there's not action--there's plenty, but it means more because the characters are so realized)

Don't see this movie if:
-Lots of cussing and violence offends you. This earns it's R. No sex or nudity to worry about, though.
-You just hate the Western genre completely
-Your favorite movie is "13 Going on 30." Come On!